![]() Users throw a lot of shade at WL for not having complex prioritization tools. I’m not into assigning contexts, but I think that is the best prioritization scheme going. He recommends this prioritization system: don’t prioritize but if you have to, do things first based on context, then time, energy, and priority (in that order). Even David Allen himself is not a fan of prioritization. I’m not a predetermined prioritization kind of girl. I tried using stars for a while, but I was just kidding myself. Wunderlist introduced folders after I created this system, so then I was able to group my checklists into a “Checklists” folder and Project Plans into a “Project Plans” folder. (I use tags for that: #NA and #outcomes.) Like I said, I’m still working on project planning. I don’t put dates on the tasks in each Project until I’m ready to schedule them (unless they are date-specific), but I do have a Next Action and a desired outcome identified for each Project Plan. GTD is as much about eliminating mental clutter and anxiety as it is about checking things off a to-do list.įor Projects, I keep a master Projects list and a separate list for each Project with tasks for that Project only. Blog post checklists are amazing! Each task in the checklist has the its own due date and repeats on my desired schedule (every 2 weeks for the steps to write and schedule my ATX Catholic post before it gets published, every 2 weeks on the day the post goes live for publicity, etc.) That way, I can see what steps are overdue and when I should have done them without leaving the whole task incomplete and feeling like I haven’t cleaned the house at all, for example. I turned those “major tasks” into full-blown lists in WL. Some of my major-tasks-that-needed-subtasks are ongoing or repeating: the aforementioned house cleaning, steps for recurring blog posts, and a few others. I chose not to whine to Wunderlist about subtasks not having due dates but instead to turn my subtasks into tasks and use more lists. Not having dates just doesn’t work for me. The vast majority of my non-Someday/Maybe tasks have due dates. So I needed due dates, and that meant I just couldn’t use subtasks. (My roommates can walk on a recently swept floor, but not on a wet one.) That was my first clue that subtasks were not the way to go. ![]() Even now, I sometimes don’t get around to mopping the kitchen floor until the day after I’ve swept it. A major task like “Clean the house” had some subtasks that could be (or had to be) completed sooner than others. It’s pretty.)Īs I started to apply GTD in a more by-the- book fashion, I realized that I needed to add due dates to my subtasks. (In the web app, there’s an automatic progress bar that visually displays completion status based on subtasks. You can reorganize subtasks in WL, but you can’t add notes or due dates to them. How I used to use subtasks was by identifying something to do and then listing the steps needed to complete it. The Natural Planning Model makes sense, but I’m still working to apply it to my GTD implementation and my life. Project planning is a part of GTD I’m still learning about. Most of the tasks for which I was using subtasks were really just checklists or poorly-defined Projects. ![]() Your mileage may vary, but this is what works for me, at least for now. Here’s a little more about my GTD implementation: I use Wunderlist, but I don’t use subtasks or stars.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |